You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epicardial cells derived from human embryonic stem cells augment cardiomyocyte-driven heart regeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41587-019-0197-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johannes Bargehr, Lay Ping Ong, Maria Colzani, Hongorzul Davaapil, Peter Hofsteen, Shiv Bhandari, Laure Gambardella, Nicolas Le Novère, Dharini Iyer, Fotios Sampaziotis, Florian Weinberger, Alessandro Bertero, Andrea Leonard, William G. Bernard, Amy Martinson, Nichola Figg, Michael Regnier, Martin R. Bennett, Charles E. Murry, Sanjay Sinha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 14% |
| Australia | 6 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Romania | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 44 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 61% |
| Scientists | 37 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 242 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 19% |
| Researcher | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 62 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 66 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 10% |
| Engineering | 18 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 69 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 215. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#183,777
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#362
of 8,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,431
of 360,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#11
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.