↓ Skip to main content

Actigraphically Measured Sleep-Wake Behavior After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Actigraphically Measured Sleep-Wake Behavior After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Published in
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, March 2017
DOI 10.1097/htr.0000000000000222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alicia C. Allan, Shannon L. Edmed, Karen A. Sullivan, Lina J. E. Karlsson, Rael T. Lange, Simon S. Smith

Abstract

To characterize and compare the sleep-wake behavior of individuals following a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) with that of noninjured healthy controls. Community. Fourteen participants with a recent mTBI (Mage = 28.07; SD = 10.45; n = 10 females) and 34 noninjured controls (Mage = 23.70; SD = 7.30; n = 31 females). Cross-sectional. Battery of subjective sleep measures and 14 days of sleep-wake monitoring via actigraphy (objective measurement) and concurrent daily sleep diary. Participants who had sustained an mTBI self-reported significantly higher sleep-related impairment, poorer nightly sleep quality, and more frequently met criteria for clinical insomnia, compared with controls (d = 0.76-1.11, large effects). The only significant between-group difference on objective sleep metrics occurred on sleep timing. On average, people with a recent history of mTBI fell asleep and woke approximately 1 hour earlier than did the controls (d = 0.62-0.92, medium to large effects). Participants with a history of mTBI had several subjective sleep complaints but relatively few objective sleep changes with the exception of earlier sleep timing. Future research is needed to understand the clinical significance of these findings and how these symptoms can be alleviated. Interventions addressing subjective sleep complaints (eg, cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia) should be tested in this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 17%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 26 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Neuroscience 11 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 31 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
#1,040
of 1,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,066
of 324,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.