↓ Skip to main content

Gender and Visibility of Sexual Cues Influence Eye Movements While Viewing Faces and Bodies

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Gender and Visibility of Sexual Cues Influence Eye Movements While Viewing Faces and Bodies
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10508-012-9911-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauri Nummenmaa, Jari K. Hietanen, Pekka Santtila, Jukka Hyönä

Abstract

Faces and bodies convey important information for the identification of potential sexual partners, yet clothing typically covers many of the bodily cues relevant for mating and reproduction. In this eye tracking study, we assessed how men and women viewed nude and clothed, same and opposite gender human figures. We found that participants inspected the nude bodies more thoroughly. First fixations landed almost always on the face, but were subsequently followed by viewing of the chest and pelvic regions. When viewing nude images, fixations were biased away from the face towards the chest and pelvic regions. Fixating these regions was also associated with elevated physiological arousal. Overall, men spent more time looking at female than male stimuli, whereas women looked equally long at male and female stimuli. In comparison to women, men spent relatively more time looking at the chests of nude female stimuli whereas women spent more time looking at the pelvic/genital region of male stimuli. We propose that the augmented and gender-contingent visual scanning of nude bodies reflects selective engagement of the visual attention circuits upon perception of signals relevant to choosing a sexual partner, which supports mating and reproduction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 148 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 20%
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Researcher 12 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Other 33 22%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 84 55%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,223,991
of 23,628,742 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#618
of 3,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,486
of 158,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#7
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,628,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.