You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome‐wide linkage meta‐analysis identifies susceptibility loci at 2q34 and 13q31.3 for genetic generalized epilepsies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epilepsia, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03379.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
EPICURE Consortium, Costin Leu, Carolien G.F. de Kovel, Federico Zara, Pasquale Striano, Marianna Pezzella, Angela Robbiano, Amedeo Bianchi, Francesca Bisulli, Antonietta Coppola, Anna Teresa Giallonardo, Francesca Beccaria, Dorothée Kasteleijn‐Nolst Trenité, Dick Lindhout, Verena Gaus, Bettina Schmitz, Dieter Janz, Yvonne G. Weber, Felicitas Becker, Holger Lerche, Ailing A. Kleefuß‐Lie, Kerstin Hallman, Wolfram S. Kunz, Christian E. Elger, Hiltrud Muhle, Ulrich Stephani, Rikke S. Møller, Helle Hjalgrim, Saul Mullen, Ingrid E. Scheffer, Samuel F. Berkovic, Kate V. Everett, Mark R. Gardiner, Carla Marini, Renzo Guerrini, Anna‐Elina Lehesjoki, Auli Siren, Rima Nabbout, Stephanie Baulac, Eric Leguern, Jose M. Serratosa, Felix Rosenow, Martha Feucht, Iris Unterberger, Athanasios Covanis, Arvid Suls, Sarah Weckhuysen, Radka Kaneva, Hande Caglayan, Dilsad Turkdogan, Betul Baykan, Nerses Bebek, Ugur Ozbek, Anne Hempelmann, Herbert Schulz, Franz Rüschendorf, Holger Trucks, Peter Nürnberg, Giuliano Avanzini, Bobby P.C. Koeleman, Thomas Sander |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 18% |
| Professor | 12 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2012.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Epilepsia
#5,537
of 5,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,514
of 254,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epilepsia
#41
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.