You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phytochemistry, pharmacology, and therapeutic uses of black seed (Nigella sativa)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1875-5364(16)30088-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wesam Kooti, Zahra Hasanzadeh-Noohi, Naim Sharafi-Ahvazi, Majid Asadi-Samani, Damoon Ashtary-Larky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 628 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 626 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 101 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 7% |
| Researcher | 42 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 5% |
| Other | 94 | 15% |
| Unknown | 257 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 71 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 45 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 23 | 4% |
| Other | 76 | 12% |
| Unknown | 281 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,835,730
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines
#7
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,999
of 318,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them