↓ Skip to main content

Fryns Syndrome Associated with Recessive Mutations in PIGN in two Separate Families

Overview of attention for article published in Human Mutation, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fryns Syndrome Associated with Recessive Mutations in PIGN in two Separate Families
Published in
Human Mutation, May 2016
DOI 10.1002/humu.22994
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aideen M McInerney-Leo, Jessica E Harris, Michael Gattas, Elizabeth E Peach, Stephen Sinnott, Tracy Dudding-Byth, Sulekha Rajagopalan, Christopher P Barnett, Lisa K Anderson, Lawrie Wheeler, Matthew A Brown, Paul J Leo, Carol Wicking, Emma L Duncan

Abstract

Fryns syndrome is an autosomal recessive condition characterized by congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), dysmorphic facial features, distal digital hypoplasia and other associated malformations, and is the most common syndromic form of CDH. No gene has been associated with this condition. Whole exome sequence data from two siblings and three unrelated individuals with Fryns syndrome were filtered for rare, good quality, coding mutations fitting a recessive inheritance model. Compound heterozygous mutations in PIGN were identified in the siblings, with appropriate parental segregation: a novel STOP mutation (c.1966C>T: p.Glu656X) and a rare (minor allele frequency <0.001) donor splice site mutation (c.1674+1G>C) causing skipping of exon 18 and utilization of a cryptic acceptor site in exon 19. A further novel homozygous STOP mutation in PIGN (c.694A>T: p.Lys232X) was detected in one unrelated case. All three variants affected highly conserved bases. The two remaining cases were negative for PIGN mutations. Mutations in PIGN have been reported in cases with multiple congenital anomalies, including one case with syndromic CDH. Fryns syndrome can be caused by recessive mutations in PIGN. Whether PIGN affects other syndromic and non-syndromic forms of CDH warrants investigation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 15%
Other 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 12 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Mutation
#456
of 2,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,259
of 312,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Mutation
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,982 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.