↓ Skip to main content

A multicenter study on the relative effectiveness of a 12-week physical training program for adults with an oncologic diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
A multicenter study on the relative effectiveness of a 12-week physical training program for adults with an oncologic diagnosis
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00520-016-3194-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hoang Tran, Cheng Lin, Fang Yu, Angie Frederick, Molly Mieras, Lorena Baccaglini

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between cancer survivors' socio-demographic and clinical characteristics and aerobic fitness changes following a physical training program. We assessed the association between participant's characteristics and aerobic fitness in the six-min walk test (6MWT) after a 12-week LIVESTRONG® at Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA) exercise program for adults with an oncologic diagnosis using linear mixed effects models. Fifty-one percent of participants had a breast cancer diagnosis and 22 % had received treatment within 1 year of enrollment. At baseline, participants who reported good/excellent health status performed better in the 6MWT than those who reported poor/fair health status (384.2 vs. 345.0 m, p = 0.035). After 12 weeks, all participants increased their average 6MWT performance by 54.2 m. After adjustment for age, gender, physical activity level, and smoking status, participants who were 60 years old or younger had a greater increase in the 6MWT score than participants older than 60 years (63.2 vs. 43.9 m, p = 0.041) while those who had never been YMCA members had a greater increase in the 6MWT compared to those who had ever been a YMCA member (62.2 vs. 40.3 m, p = 0.041). Overall, aerobic fitness among adults with an oncologic diagnosis increased after a 12-week exercise program, particularly among participants who were 60 years old or younger or were not YMCA members at enrollment. Participants with poorer health had lower aerobic fitness at baseline, though they had a similar positive response to the program as healthier participants. Future study designs may include randomization and an additional untreated arm.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 31 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 19%
Sports and Recreations 13 13%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 32 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2016.
All research outputs
#20,317,110
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#4,013
of 4,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,425
of 300,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#86
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.