↓ Skip to main content

The impacts of spatially targeted programmes: evidence from Guangdong

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Studies, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impacts of spatially targeted programmes: evidence from Guangdong
Published in
Regional Studies, August 2019
DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1635688
Authors

Elisa Barbieri, Chiara Pollio, Francesco Prota

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 31%
Unspecified 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,633,587
of 25,466,764 outputs
Outputs from Regional Studies
#389
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,444
of 359,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Studies
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,466,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.