↓ Skip to main content

Non-coding RNAs as Emerging Regulators of Neural Injury Responses and Regeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience Bulletin, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Non-coding RNAs as Emerging Regulators of Neural Injury Responses and Regeneration
Published in
Neuroscience Bulletin, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12264-016-0028-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Songlin Zhou, Fei Ding, Xiaosong Gu

Abstract

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are a large cluster of RNAs that do not encode proteins, but have multiple functions in diverse cellular processes. Mounting evidence indicates the involvement of ncRNAs in the physiology and pathophysiology of the central and peripheral nervous systems. It has been shown that numerous ncRNAs, especially microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs, are differentially expressed after insults such as acquired brain injury, spinal cord injury, and peripheral nerve injury. These ncRNAs affect neuronal survival, neurite regrowth, and glial phenotype primarily by targeting specific mRNAs, resulting in translation repression or degradation of the mRNAs. An increasing number of studies have investigated the regulatory roles of microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs in neural injury and regeneration, and thus a new research field is emerging. In this review, we highlight current progress in the field in an attempt to provide further insight into post-transcriptional changes occurring after neural injury, and to facilitate the potential use of ncRNAs for improving neural regeneration. We also suggest potential directions for future studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Master 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 26%
Neuroscience 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,800,201
of 24,679,965 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience Bulletin
#231
of 873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,341
of 305,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience Bulletin
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,679,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 873 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.