↓ Skip to main content

How to fix a broken heart: Cardiac disease and the ‘multiverse’ of stem cell research in Canada

Overview of attention for article published in BioSocieties, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
How to fix a broken heart: Cardiac disease and the ‘multiverse’ of stem cell research in Canada
Published in
BioSocieties, November 2016
DOI 10.1057/biosoc.2016.5
Authors

Annette Leibing, Virginie Tournay, Rachel Aisengart Menezes, Rafaela Zorzanelli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 33%
Other 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,379,458
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from BioSocieties
#121
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,688
of 415,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioSocieties
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.