↓ Skip to main content

Understanding and addressing exhibitionism in Java empirical research about method accessibility

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Software Engineering, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Understanding and addressing exhibitionism in Java empirical research about method accessibility
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10664-015-9365-9
Authors

Santiago A. Vidal, Alexandre Bergel, Claudia Marcos, J. Andrés Díaz-Pace

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 35%
Student > Master 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 9 53%
Social Sciences 3 18%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2016.
All research outputs
#12,890,894
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#343
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,575
of 357,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.