↓ Skip to main content

Balance sheet and currency mismatch: evidence for Peruvian firms

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Economics, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Balance sheet and currency mismatch: evidence for Peruvian firms
Published in
Empirical Economics, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00181-018-1459-y
Authors

N. R. Ramírez-Rondán

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 38%
Linguistics 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,729,058
of 23,646,998 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Economics
#109
of 739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,624
of 332,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Economics
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,646,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.