↓ Skip to main content

Cooperative Genome-Wide Analysis Shows Increased Homozygosity in Early Onset Parkinson's Disease

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cooperative Genome-Wide Analysis Shows Increased Homozygosity in Early Onset Parkinson's Disease
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0028787
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Simón-Sánchez, Laura L. Kilarski, Michael A. Nalls, Maria Martinez, Claudia Schulte, Peter Holmans, Thomas Gasser, John Hardy, Andrew B. Singleton, Nicholas W. Wood, Alexis Brice, Peter Heutink, Nigel Williams, Huw R. Morris

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) occurs in both familial and sporadic forms, and both monogenic and complex genetic factors have been identified. Early onset PD (EOPD) is particularly associated with autosomal recessive (AR) mutations, and three genes, PARK2, PARK7 and PINK1, have been found to carry mutations leading to AR disease. Since mutations in these genes account for less than 10% of EOPD patients, we hypothesized that further recessive genetic factors are involved in this disorder, which may appear in extended runs of homozygosity.We carried out genome wide SNP genotyping to look for extended runs of homozygosity (ROHs) in 1,445 EOPD cases and 6,987 controls. Logistic regression analyses showed an increased level of genomic homozygosity in EOPD cases compared to controls. These differences are larger for ROH of 9 Mb and above, where there is a more than three-fold increase in the proportion of cases carrying a ROH. These differences are not explained by occult recessive mutations at existing loci. Controlling for genome wide homozygosity in logistic regression analyses increased the differences between cases and controls, indicating that in EOPD cases ROHs do not simply relate to genome wide measures of inbreeding. Homozygosity at a locus on chromosome19p13.3 was identified as being more common in EOPD cases as compared to controls. Sequencing analysis of genes and predicted transcripts within this locus failed to identify a novel mutation causing EOPD in our cohort.There is an increased rate of genome wide homozygosity in EOPD, as measured by an increase in ROHs. These ROHs are a signature of inbreeding and do not necessarily harbour disease-causing genetic variants. Although there might be other regions of interest apart from chromosome 19p13.3, we lack the power to detect them with this analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 7%
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 51 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Other 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 12%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2012.
All research outputs
#16,759,555
of 24,652,007 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#149,084
of 213,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,212
of 160,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,234
of 3,511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,652,007 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.