↓ Skip to main content

Beyond price: individuals' accounts of deciding to pay for private healthcare treatment in the UK

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Beyond price: individuals' accounts of deciding to pay for private healthcare treatment in the UK
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-53
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Exley, Nikki Rousseau, Cam Donaldson, Jimmy G Steele

Abstract

Delivering appropriate and affordable healthcare is a concern across the globe. As countries grapple with the issue of delivering healthcare with finite resources and populations continue to age, more health-related care services or treatments may become an optional 'extra' to be purchased privately. It is timely to consider how, and to what extent, the individual can act as both a 'patient' and a 'consumer'. In the UK the majority of healthcare treatments are free at the point of delivery. However, increasingly some healthcare treatments are being made available via the private healthcare market. Drawing from insights from healthcare policy and social sciences, this paper uses the exemplar of private dental implant treatment provision in the UK to examine what factors people considered when deciding whether or not to pay for a costly healthcare treatment for a non-fatal condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Egypt 1 2%
Unknown 59 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 19 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 27%
Social Sciences 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 21 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2012.
All research outputs
#13,128,816
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,422
of 7,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,513
of 156,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#36
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.