You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rating experience of ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation: co-design of a feedback questionnaire
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aphasiology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/02687038.2019.1649913 |
| Authors |
Áine Kearns, Helen Kelly, Ian Pitt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 4 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Psychology | 9 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,698,302
of 23,217,343 outputs
Outputs from Aphasiology
#210
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,426
of 345,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aphasiology
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,217,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.