↓ Skip to main content

Relationality and rationality in Confucian and Western traditions of thought

Overview of attention for article published in Cambridge Review of International Affairs, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationality and rationality in Confucian and Western traditions of thought
Published in
Cambridge Review of International Affairs, July 2019
DOI 10.1080/09557571.2019.1641470
Authors

Yaqing Qin, Astrid H. M. Nordin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 5 14%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 16 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 38%
Arts and Humanities 5 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Unknown 16 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#20,576,009
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Cambridge Review of International Affairs
#495
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,582
of 346,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cambridge Review of International Affairs
#21
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.