↓ Skip to main content

Macronutrient Content of the Diet: What Do We Know About Energy Balance and Weight Maintenance?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Obesity Reports, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Macronutrient Content of the Diet: What Do We Know About Energy Balance and Weight Maintenance?
Published in
Current Obesity Reports, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13679-016-0209-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer A. Fleming, Penny M. Kris-Etherton

Abstract

The 2013 AHA/ACC Clinical Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity recommends a reduced energy diet for weight loss regardless of the macronutrient content. However, diet composition may affect the maintenance of weight loss. In general, a healthful dietary pattern with reduced portion sizes, low energy dense foods, and physical activity are successful for many. Certain populations, such as those with insulin resistance, may find reductions in carbohydrate and higher levels of unsaturated fats to be more effective and promote greater adherence. Of importance is that metabolic adaptations following weight loss also may impact weight loss maintenance and should be considered in the transition from weight loss to weight stabilization. Thus, weight loss and weight maintenance strategies are both important in an intervention for sustaining long-term behavior change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 97 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 27 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,062,818
of 24,787,209 outputs
Outputs from Current Obesity Reports
#123
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,531
of 306,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Obesity Reports
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,787,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.