↓ Skip to main content

Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of ablation margins based on registration of pre- and post-procedural MRI and distance map

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of ablation margins based on registration of pre- and post-procedural MRI and distance map
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11548-016-1398-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soichiro Tani, Servet Tatli, Nobuhiko Hata, Xavier Garcia-Rojas, Olutayo I. Olubiyi, Stuart G. Silverman, Junichi Tokuda

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced MR images are widely used to confirm the adequacy of ablation margin after liver ablation for early prediction of local recurrence. However, quantitative assessment of the ablation margin by comparing pre- and post-procedural images remains challenging. We developed and tested a novel method for three-dimensional quantitative assessment of ablation margin based on non-rigid image registration and 3D distance map. Our method was tested with pre- and post-procedural MR images acquired in 21 patients who underwent image-guided percutaneous liver ablation. The two images were co-registered using non-rigid intensity-based registration. After the tumor and ablation volumes were segmented, target volume coverage, percent of tumor coverage, and Dice similarity coefficient were calculated as metrics representing overall adequacy of ablation. In addition, 3D distance map around the tumor was computed and superimposed on the ablation volume to identify the area with insufficient margins. For patients with local recurrences, the follow-up images were registered to the post-procedural image. Three-dimensional minimum distance between the recurrence and the areas with insufficient margins was quantified. The percent tumor coverage for all nonrecurrent cases was 100 %. Five cases had tumor recurrences, and the 3D distance map revealed insufficient tumor coverage or a 0-mm margin. It also showed that two recurrences were remote to the insufficient margin. Non-rigid registration and 3D distance map allow us to quantitatively evaluate the adequacy of the ablation margin after percutaneous liver ablation. The method may be useful to predict local recurrences immediately following ablation procedure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 36%
Engineering 13 26%
Computer Science 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,297,348
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#212
of 857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,704
of 300,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 857 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.