↓ Skip to main content

The evaluation of dual-task conditions on static postural control in the older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
The evaluation of dual-task conditions on static postural control in the older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1107-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Petrigna, Ewan Thomas, Ambra Gentile, Antonio Paoli, Simona Pajaujiene, Antonio Palma, Antonino Bianco

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 28 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 18%
Sports and Recreations 13 16%
Psychology 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 31 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2019.
All research outputs
#15,578,089
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,606
of 2,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,534
of 347,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#51
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.