| Title |
Interactions between endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) and titanium implant surfaces
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Oral Investigations, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00784-012-0691-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Ziebart, Anne Schnell, Christian Walter, Peer W. Kämmerer, Andreas Pabst, Karl M. Lehmann, Johanna Ziebart, Marc O. Klein, Bilal Al-Nawas |
| Abstract |
Endothelial cells play an important role in peri-implant angiogenesis during early bone formation. Therefore, interactions between endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and titanium dental implant surfaces are of crucial interest. The aim of our in vitro study was to investigate the reactions of EPCs in contact with different commercially available implant surfaces. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Engineering | 6 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2012.
All research outputs
#20,156,138
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#1,009
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,753
of 156,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.