↓ Skip to main content

A randomized trial of cold-exposure on energy expenditure and supraclavicular brown adipose tissue volume in humans

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomized trial of cold-exposure on energy expenditure and supraclavicular brown adipose tissue volume in humans
Published in
Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.metabol.2016.03.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thobias Romu, Camilla Vavruch, Olof Dahlqvist-Leinhard, Joakim Tallberg, Nils Dahlström, Anders Persson, Mikael Heglind, Martin E. Lidell, Sven Enerbäck, Magnus Borga, Fredrik H. Nystrom

Abstract

To study if repeated cold-exposure increases metabolic rate and/or brown adipose tissue (BAT) volume in humans when compared with avoiding to freeze. Randomized, open, parallel-group trial. Healthy non-selected participants were randomized to achieve cold-exposure 1hour/day, or to avoid any sense of feeling cold, for 6weeks. Metabolic rate (MR) was measured by indirect calorimetry before and after acute cold-exposure with cold vests and ingestion of cold water. The BAT volumes in the supraclavicular region were measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Twenty-eight participants were recruited, 12 were allocated to controls and 16 to cold-exposure. Two participants in the cold group dropped out and one was excluded. Both the non-stimulated and the cold-stimulated MR were lowered within the group randomized to avoid cold (MR at room temperature from 1841±199 kCal/24h to 1795±213 kCal/24h, p=0.047 cold-activated MR from 1900±150 kCal/24h to 1793±215 kCal/24h, p=0.028). There was a trend towards increased MR at room temperature following the intervention in the cold-group (p=0.052). The difference between MR changes by the interventions between groups was statistically significant (p=0.008 at room temperature, p=0.032 after cold-activation). In an on-treatment analysis after exclusion of two participants that reported ≥8days without cold-exposure, supraclavicular BAT volume had increased in the cold-exposure group (from 0.0175±0.015l to 0.0216±0.014l, p=0.049). We found evidence for plasticity in metabolic rate by avoiding to freeze compared with cold-exposure in a randomized setting in non-selected humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Other 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,664,259
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental
#275
of 3,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,576
of 314,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.