↓ Skip to main content

sFRP2 in the aged microenvironment drives melanoma metastasis and therapy resistance

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
97 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
305 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
410 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
sFRP2 in the aged microenvironment drives melanoma metastasis and therapy resistance
Published in
Nature, April 2016
DOI 10.1038/nature17392
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanpreet Kaur, Marie R. Webster, Katie Marchbank, Reeti Behera, Abibatou Ndoye, Curtis H. Kugel, Vanessa M. Dang, Jessica Appleton, Michael P. O’Connell, Phil Cheng, Alexander A. Valiga, Rachel Morissette, Nazli B. McDonnell, Luigi Ferrucci, Andrew V. Kossenkov, Katrina Meeth, Hsin-Yao Tang, Xiangfan Yin, William H. Wood, Elin Lehrmann, Kevin G. Becker, Keith T. Flaherty, Dennie T. Frederick, Jennifer A. Wargo, Zachary A. Cooper, Michael T. Tetzlaff, Courtney Hudgens, Katherine M. Aird, Rugang Zhang, Xiaowei Xu, Qin Liu, Edmund Bartlett, Giorgos Karakousis, Zeynep Eroglu, Roger S. Lo, Matthew Chan, Alexander M. Menzies, Georgina V. Long, Douglas B. Johnson, Jeffrey Sosman, Bastian Schilling, Dirk Schadendorf, David W. Speicher, Marcus Bosenberg, Antoni Ribas, Ashani T. Weeraratna

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 400 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 24%
Researcher 84 20%
Student > Master 40 10%
Student > Bachelor 30 7%
Other 29 7%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 74 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 122 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 60 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 34 8%
Unknown 86 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 279. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2024.
All research outputs
#132,211
of 26,063,110 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#8,575
of 99,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,356
of 316,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#192
of 1,009 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,063,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,009 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.