↓ Skip to main content

Daylight Saving Time and Artificial Time Zones – A Battle Between Biological and Social Times

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 15,733)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
122 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
234 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Daylight Saving Time and Artificial Time Zones – A Battle Between Biological and Social Times
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.00944
Pubmed ID
Authors

Till Roenneberg, Eva C. Winnebeck, Elizabeth B. Klerman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 234 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Professor 8 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 47 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Engineering 7 5%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 58 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#13,722
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4
of 15,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223
of 357,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#1
of 383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.