↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Plasma Membrane Integrity by Fluorescent Detection of Tl+ Uptake

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Membrane Biology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of Plasma Membrane Integrity by Fluorescent Detection of Tl+ Uptake
Published in
The Journal of Membrane Biology, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00232-010-9269-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela M. Bowman, Olena M. Nesin, Olga N. Pakhomova, Andrei G. Pakhomov

Abstract

The exclusion of polar dyes by healthy cells is widely employed as a simple and reliable test for cell membrane integrity. However, commonly used dyes (propidium, Yo-Pro-1, trypan blue) cannot detect membrane defects which are smaller than the dye molecule itself, such as nanopores that form by exposure to ultrashort electric pulses (USEPs). Instead, here we demonstrate that opening of nanopores can be efficiently detected and studied by fluorescent measurement of Tl(+) uptake. Various mammalian cells (CHO, GH3, NG108), loaded with a Tl(+)-sensitive fluorophore FluxOR and subjected to USEPs in a Tl(+)-containing bath buffer, displayed an immediate (within <100 ms), dose-dependent surge of fluorescence. In all tested cell lines, the threshold for membrane permeabilization to Tl(+) by 600-ns USEP was at 1-2 kV/cm, and the rate of Tl(+) uptake increased linearly with increasing the electric field. The lack of concurrent entry of larger dye molecules suggested that the size of nanopores is less than 1-1.5 nm. Tested ion channel inhibitors as well as removal of the extracellular Ca(2+) did not block the USEP effect. Addition of a Tl(+)-containing buffer within less than 10 min after USEP also caused a fluorescence surge, which confirms the minutes-long lifetime of nanopores. Overall, the technique of fluorescent detection of Tl(+) uptake proved highly effective, noninvasive and sensitive for visualization and analysis of membrane defects which are too small for conventional dye uptake detection methods.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 89 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 26%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 16%
Engineering 13 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Chemistry 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2012.
All research outputs
#21,153,429
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#740
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,672
of 97,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#11
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.