↓ Skip to main content

Tradeoffs between fisheries harvest and the resilience of coral reefs

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
114 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tradeoffs between fisheries harvest and the resilience of coral reefs
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2016
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1601529113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yves-Marie Bozec, Shay O'Farrell, J Henrich Bruggemann, Brian E Luckhurst, Peter J Mumby

Abstract

Many countries are legally obliged to embrace ecosystem-based approaches to fisheries management. Reductions in bycatch and physical habitat damage are now commonplace, but mitigating more sophisticated impacts associated with the ecological functions of target fisheries species are in their infancy. Here we model the impacts of a parrotfish fishery on the future state and resilience of Caribbean coral reefs, enabling us to view the tradeoff between harvest and ecosystem health. We find that the implementation of a simple and enforceable size restriction of >30 cm provides a win:win outcome in the short term, delivering both ecological and fisheries benefits and leading to increased yield and greater coral recovery rate for a given harvest rate. However, maintaining resilient coral reefs even until 2030 requires the addition of harvest limitations (<10% of virgin fishable biomass) to cope with a changing climate and induced coral disturbances, even in reefs that are relatively healthy today. Managing parrotfish is not a panacea for protecting coral reefs but can play a role in sustaining the health of reefs and high-quality habitat for reef fisheries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 114 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Bermuda 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belize 1 <1%
Unknown 334 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 73 21%
Student > Master 69 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Other 19 6%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 48 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 118 34%
Environmental Science 106 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 3%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 67 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2020.
All research outputs
#208,749
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#3,933
of 103,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,652
of 315,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#98
of 881 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 881 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.