| Title |
Antagonistic effects of large- and small-scale disturbances on exotic tree invasion in a native tussock grassland relict
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-010-9702-2 |
| Authors |
C. Noemí Mazía, Enrique J. Chaneton, Marina Machera, Andrea Uchitel, María Victoria Feler, Claudio M. Ghersa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 61% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,847,776
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#856
of 2,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,009
of 165,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.