↓ Skip to main content

Ecological risk assessment and its application to elasmobranch conservation and management

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Fish Biology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecological risk assessment and its application to elasmobranch conservation and management
Published in
Journal of Fish Biology, March 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03235.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. J. Gallagher, P. M. Kyne, N. Hammerschlag

Abstract

Ecological risk assessments (ERAs) are employed to quantify and predict the vulnerability of a particular species, stock or population to a specific stressor, e.g. pollution, harvesting, climate change, by-catch. Data generated from ERAs are used to identify and prioritize species for implementation of effective conservation and management strategies. At this time, ERAs are of particular importance to elasmobranchs, given the ecological importance and documented global population declines of some elasmobranch species. Here, ERAs as a tool for elasmobranch conservation and management are reviewed and a theoretical roadmap provided for future studies. To achieve these goals, a brief history of ERAs and approaches used within them (in the context of elasmobranchs) are given, and a comprehensive review conducted of all ERA studies associated with elasmobranchs published between 1998 and 2011. The hazards assessed, species evaluated and methodological approaches taken are recorded. Chronological and geographical patterns suggest that this tool has grown in popularity as a commercial fishery management instrument, while also signalling a recent precautionary approach to elasmobranch management in commercial fisheries globally. The analysis demonstrates that the predominant parameters incorporated in previous ERAs are largely based on life-history characteristics, and sharks have received the majority of attention; batoids (including skates) have received less attention. Recreational fishing and habitat degradation are discussed as hazards which warrant future investigation through ERA. Lastly, suggestions are made for incorporating descriptive ecological data to aid in the continued development and evolution of this management tool as it applies to future elasmobranch conservation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 295 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 64 20%
Student > Master 54 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 17%
Researcher 45 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 39 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 154 49%
Environmental Science 66 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 56 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2012.
All research outputs
#7,587,426
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fish Biology
#1,381
of 5,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,660
of 161,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fish Biology
#16
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.