You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The CHD4-related syndrome: a comprehensive investigation of the clinical spectrum, genotype–phenotype correlations, and molecular basis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41436-019-0612-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karin Weiss, Hayley P. Lazar, Alina Kurolap, Ariel F. Martinez, Tamar Paperna, Lior Cohen, Marie F. Smeland, Sandra Whalen, Solveig Heide, Boris Keren, Pauline Terhal, Melita Irving, Motoki Takaku, John D. Roberts, Robert M. Petrovich, Samantha A. Schrier Vergano, Amy Kenney, Hanne Hove, Elizabeth DeChene, Shane C. Quinonez, Estelle Colin, Alban Ziegler, Melissa Rumple, Mahim Jain, Danielle Monteil, Elizabeth R. Roeder, Kimberly Nugent, Arie van Haeringen, Michael Gambello, Avni Santani, Līvija Medne, Bryan Krock, Cara M. Skraban, Elaine H. Zackai, Holly A. Dubbs, Thomas Smol, Jamal Ghoumid, Michael J. Parker, Michael Wright, Peter Turnpenny, Jill Clayton-Smith, Kay Metcalfe, Hitoshi Kurumizaka, Bruce D. Gelb, Hagit Baris Feldman, Philippe M. Campeau, Maximilian Muenke, Paul A. Wade, Katherine Lachlan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 50% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| Israel | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,005,933
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#296
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,380
of 356,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#10
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.