↓ Skip to main content

Insights into Spray Development from Metered-Dose Inhalers Through Quantitative X-ray Radiography

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Insights into Spray Development from Metered-Dose Inhalers Through Quantitative X-ray Radiography
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11095-016-1869-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Mason-Smith, Daniel J. Duke, Alan L. Kastengren, Peter J. Stewart, Daniela Traini, Paul M. Young, Yang Chen, David A. Lewis, Julio Soria, Daniel Edgington-Mitchell, Damon Honnery

Abstract

Typical methods to study pMDI sprays employ particle sizing or visible light diagnostics, which suffer in regions of high spray density. X-ray techniques can be applied to pharmaceutical sprays to obtain information unattainable by conventional particle sizing and light-based techniques. We present a technique for obtaining quantitative measurements of spray density in pMDI sprays. A monochromatic focused X-ray beam was used to perform quantitative radiography measurements in the near-nozzle region and plume of HFA-propelled sprays. Measurements were obtained with a temporal resolution of 0.184 ms and spatial resolution of 5 μm. Steady flow conditions were reached after around 30 ms for the formulations examined with the spray device used. Spray evolution was affected by the inclusion of ethanol in the formulation and unaffected by the inclusion of 0.1% drug by weight. Estimation of the nozzle exit density showed that vapour is likely to dominate the flow leaving the inhaler nozzle during steady flow. Quantitative measurements in pMDI sprays allow the determination of nozzle exit conditions that are difficult to obtain experimentally by other means. Measurements of these nozzle exit conditions can improve understanding of the atomization mechanisms responsible for pMDI spray droplet and particle formation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Portugal 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Professor 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,710,332
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#155
of 2,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,394
of 297,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.