| Title |
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) for Guidelines: Paper 2 – Using qualitative evidence synthesis findings to inform evidence-to-decision frameworks and recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-019-0468-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Lewin, Claire Glenton, Theresa A. Lawrie, Soo Downe, Kenneth W. Finlayson, Sarah Rosenbaum, María Barreix, Özge Tunçalp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| Ireland | 2 | 12% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 20% |
| Unknown | 40 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Psychology | 7 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 45 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,454,071
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#365
of 1,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,781
of 343,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.