↓ Skip to main content

Inter-observer agreement for Crohn's disease sub-phenotypes using the Montreal Classification: How good are we? A multi-centre Australasian study☆

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Crohn's and Colitis Supplements, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inter-observer agreement for Crohn's disease sub-phenotypes using the Montreal Classification: How good are we? A multi-centre Australasian study☆
Published in
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis Supplements, October 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.crohns.2011.08.016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krupa Krishnaprasad, Jane M. Andrews, Ian C. Lawrance, Timothy Florin, Richard B. Gearry, Rupert W.L. Leong, Gillian Mahy, Peter Bampton, Ruth Prosser, Peta Leach, Laurie Chitti, Charles Cock, Rachel Grafton, Anthony R. Croft, Sharon Cooke, James D. Doecke, Graham L. Radford-Smith

Abstract

Crohn's disease (CD) exhibits significant clinical heterogeneity. Classification systems attempt to describe this; however, their utility and reliability depends on inter-observer agreement (IOA). We therefore sought to evaluate IOA using the Montreal Classification (MC).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2012.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Crohn's and Colitis Supplements
#1,733
of 2,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,874
of 144,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Crohn's and Colitis Supplements
#18
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.