| Title |
Comparative Effectiveness of Combining MTX with Biologic Drug Therapy Versus Either MTX or Biologics Alone for Early Rheumatoid Arthritis in Adults: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-019-05230-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katrina E. Donahue, Elizabeth R. Schulman, Gerald Gartlehner, Beth L. Jonas, Emmanuel Coker-Schwimmer, Sheila V. Patel, Rachel Palmieri Weber, Carla M. Bann, Meera Viswanathan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| South Africa | 2 | 20% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 27% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2023.
All research outputs
#513,895
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#404
of 8,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,558
of 357,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#9
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.