| Title |
The value of by-catch data: how species-specific surveys can serve non-target species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-019-1310-6 |
| Authors |
Maria Vittoria Mazzamuto, Mario Lo Valvo, Stefano Anile |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Chile | 1 | 9% |
| Colombia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 20% |
| Researcher | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,643,771
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#213
of 918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,351
of 345,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.