↓ Skip to main content

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
9 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10803-010-1078-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Bent, Kiah Bertoglio, Paul Ashwood, Alan Bostrom, Robert L. Hendren

Abstract

We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility and initial safety and efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids (1.3 g/day) for the treatment of hyperactivity in 27 children ages 3-8 with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). After 12 weeks, hyperactivity, as measured by the Aberrant Behavior Checklist, improved 2.7 (± 4.8) points in the omega-3 group compared to 0.3 (± 7.2) points in the placebo group (p = 0.40; effect size = 0.38). Correlations were found between decreases in five fatty acid levels and decreases in hyperactivity, and the treatment was well tolerated. Although this pilot study did not find a statistically significant benefit from omega-3 fatty acids, the small sample size does not rule out small to moderate beneficial effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 194 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 22%
Student > Master 33 17%
Researcher 19 10%
Other 16 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 36 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 25%
Psychology 22 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 9%
Neuroscience 11 6%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 48 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,341,161
of 24,669,628 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#512
of 5,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,101
of 99,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,669,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.