| Title |
The influence of power dynamics and trust on multidisciplinary collaboration: a qualitative case study of type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-63 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie McDonald, Rohan Jayasuriya, Mark Fort Harris |
| Abstract |
Ongoing care for chronic conditions such as diabetes is best provided by a range of health professionals working together. There are challenges in achieving this where collaboration crosses organisational and sector boundaries. The aim of this article is to explore the influence of power dynamics and trust on collaboration between health professionals involved in the management of diabetes and their impact on patient experiences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 360 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 11% |
| Researcher | 32 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 81 | 22% |
| Unknown | 85 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 73 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 23 | 6% |
| Psychology | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 51 | 14% |
| Unknown | 97 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,760,443
of 24,289,456 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,824
of 8,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,294
of 160,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#26
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,289,456 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.