↓ Skip to main content

Addressing the Adherence-Adaptation Debate: Lessons from the Replication of an Evidence-Based Sexual Health Program in School Settings

Overview of attention for article published in Prevention Science, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Addressing the Adherence-Adaptation Debate: Lessons from the Replication of an Evidence-Based Sexual Health Program in School Settings
Published in
Prevention Science, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11121-019-01032-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenita Parekh, Elizabeth Stuart, Robert Blum, Valerie Caldas, Brooke Whitfield, Jacky M. Jennings

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 12 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 19%
Social Sciences 3 12%
Psychology 3 12%
Computer Science 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,578,119
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Prevention Science
#638
of 1,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,870
of 345,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prevention Science
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.