↓ Skip to main content

Climate has a larger effect than stand basal area on wood density in Pinus ponderosa var. scopulorum in the southwestern USA

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Forest Science , August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Climate has a larger effect than stand basal area on wood density in Pinus ponderosa var. scopulorum in the southwestern USA
Published in
Annals of Forest Science , August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13595-019-0869-0
Authors

Damon Vaughan, David Auty, Thomas E. Kolb, Andrew J. Sánchez Meador, Kurt H. Mackes, Joseph Dahlen, W. Keith Moser

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 38%
Environmental Science 8 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,097,846
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#309
of 943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,296
of 356,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#11
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.