↓ Skip to main content

Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema

Overview of attention for article published in Tobacco Induced Diseases, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema
Published in
Tobacco Induced Diseases, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12971-015-0033-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhi-Hui He, Ping Chen, Yan Chen, Sheng-Dong He, Ji-Ru Ye, Hong-Liang Zhang, Jun Cao

Abstract

Emphysema is the main pathological feature of COPD and also is the focus of the related research. Although several emphysema animal models have been established, exact comparison of findings is seldom. The present study aimed to compare cigarette smoke (CS) exposure-induced emphysema model and intraperitoneal injection of cigarette smoke extract (CSE)-induced emphysema model to evaluate the effectiveness of the two different modeling methods. Six-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice were used and randomly divided into two groups: CS exposure and intraperitoneal injection of CSE. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups: control and CS or CSE. Lung function, mean linear intercept (MLI), destructive index (DI), apoptotic index (AI), total and differential cells count in broncholavolar lavage fluid (BALF), SOD and IL-6 concentration in serum were measured. Compared with their respective controls, lung function was significantly decreased in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); MLI, DI, and AI of lung tissue were significantly higher in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); total number of leukocytes, the number and percentage of neutrophils (NEUs), and the number of macrophages (MAC) in BALF were significantly higher in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); SOD concentration in serum was significantly decreased in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); IL-6 concentration in serum was significantly increased in in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between CS group and CSE group in any of the parameters described above. Both CS exposure and intraperitoneal injection of CSE could induce emphysema and the effectiveness of the two different modeling methods were equal.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 15 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 19 41%