| Title |
Effectiveness of treatments for acute and sub-acute mechanical non-specific low back pain: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1116-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvia Gianola, Greta Castellini, Anita Andreano, Davide Corbetta, Pamela Frigerio, Valentina Pecoraro, Valentina Redaelli, Andrea Tettamanti, Andrea Turolla, Lorenzo Moja, Maria Grazia Valsecchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 185 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 74 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 20% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 80 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#18,687,330
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,798
of 2,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,896
of 345,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#51
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.