↓ Skip to main content

The efficacy of standard versus accelerated epi-off corneal cross-linking protocols: a systematic review and sub-group analysis

Overview of attention for article published in International Ophthalmology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
The efficacy of standard versus accelerated epi-off corneal cross-linking protocols: a systematic review and sub-group analysis
Published in
International Ophthalmology, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10792-019-01091-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad Miraftab, Hassan Hashemi, Mohammad Abdollahi, Shekoufeh Nikfar, Soheila Asgari

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 50%
Unspecified 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2019.
All research outputs
#20,576,667
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from International Ophthalmology
#681
of 1,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,065
of 352,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Ophthalmology
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,043 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.