↓ Skip to main content

High quality reference genome of drumstick tree (Moringa oleifera Lam.), a potential perennial crop

Overview of attention for article published in Science China Life Sciences, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
High quality reference genome of drumstick tree (Moringa oleifera Lam.), a potential perennial crop
Published in
Science China Life Sciences, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11427-015-4872-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Tian, Yan Zeng, Jing Zhang, ChengGuang Yang, Liang Yan, XuanJun Wang, ChongYing Shi, Jing Xie, TianYi Dai, Lei Peng, Yu Zeng Huan, AnNi Xu, YeWei Huang, JiaJin Zhang, Xiao Ma, Yang Dong, ShuMei Hao, Jun Sheng

Abstract

The drumstick tree (Moringa oleifera Lam.) is a perennial crop that has gained popularity in certain developing countries for its high-nutrition content and adaptability to arid and semi-arid environments. Here we report a high-quality draft genome sequence of M. oleifera. This assembly represents 91.78% of the estimated genome size and contains 19,465 protein-coding genes. Comparative genomic analysis between M. oleifera and related woody plant genomes helps clarify the general evolution of this species, while the identification of several species-specific gene families and positively selected genes in M. oleifera may help identify genes related to M. oleifera's high protein content, fast-growth, heat and stress tolerance. This reference genome greatly extends the basic research on M. oleifera, and may further promote applying genomics to enhanced breeding and improvement of M. oleifera.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 114 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Chemistry 4 3%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,796,648
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Science China Life Sciences
#87
of 1,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,613
of 267,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Life Sciences
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.