↓ Skip to main content

Trying to separate the wheat from the chaff: Construct- and faking-related variance on the Implicit Association Test (IAT)

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Trying to separate the wheat from the chaff: Construct- and faking-related variance on the Implicit Association Test (IAT)
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, February 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13428-015-0568-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Röhner, Torsten Ewers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 68%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#1,469
of 2,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,944
of 269,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.