↓ Skip to main content

Cystic lesions of the pancreas—is radical surgery really warranted?

Overview of attention for article published in Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Cystic lesions of the pancreas—is radical surgery really warranted?
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00423-016-1416-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim C. Honselmann, Tobias Krauss, Sebastian Geserick, Ulrich F. Wellner, Uwe Wittel, Ulrich T. Hopt, Tobias Keck, Dirk Bausch

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate diagnostic accuracy of cystic lesions of the pancreas in order to determine if less aggressive surgical treatment might be safe and therefore warranted. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 232 patients with either observed or resected cystic lesions of the pancreas referred for evaluation and treatment to the University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany, between 2001 and 2011. Most patients had MRI or CT for preoperative imaging (90.6 %). Preoperatively, benign pseudocysts (BPC) were diagnosed in 84 (36.2 %) patients and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) in 59 (25.2 %) patients, whereas serous cyst adenoma, mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPPTs), and neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) were less common. In 43 % of patients, the preoperative diagnosis concurred with the postoperative diagnosis. The preoperative diagnosis was accurate in BPC, less so in IPMN, and inaccurate in MCN, NET, and SPPT. However, prediction of tumor biology was accurate; only 11 % of the lesions regarded as benign turned out to be malignant after resection, and no patient without resection developed malignancy at a median follow-up of 8 months. Subsequently, 89 % of diagnosed benign tumors had indeed benign pathology. The prediction of biology is often correct, whereas specific diagnosis is often wrong. A considerable amount of benign lesions are treated more aggressively than warranted if malignancy is suspected prior to surgery. Parenchyma-sparing techniques might be an option, but prospective multicenter studies need to follow. Experienced pancreatic radiologists can improve accuracy of preoperative biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 18%
Other 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 5 23%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Unspecified 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,450,346
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#789
of 1,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,384
of 300,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#26
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.