| Title |
“Unsettling circularity”: Clinical trial enrichment and the evidentiary politics of chronic pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioSocieties, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1057/biosoc.2016.7 |
| Authors |
Jonah Campbell, Nicholas B King |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 29% |
| Denmark | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 22% |
| Unknown | 13 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,862,177
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from BioSocieties
#79
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,714
of 315,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioSocieties
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.