↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Appendectomy Outcomes on the Weekend and During the Week are no Different: A National Study of 151,774 Patients

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Outcomes on the Weekend and During the Week are no Different: A National Study of 151,774 Patients
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00268-012-1550-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathias Worni, Truls Østbye, Mihir Gandhi, Dimple Rajgor, Jatin Shah, Anand Shah, Ricardo Pietrobon, Danny O. Jacobs, Ulrich Guller

Abstract

The "weekend effect" is defined as increased morbidity and mortality for patients admitted on weekends compared with weekdays. It has been observed for several diseases, including myocardial infarction and renal insufficiency; however, it has not yet been investigated for laparoscopic appendectomy in acute appendicitis-one of the most prevalent surgical diagnoses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 9 26%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 60%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2016.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,713
of 4,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,860
of 173,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#15
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.