↓ Skip to main content

Effect of jaw thrust and cricoid pressure maneuvers on glottic visualization during GlideScope videolaryngoscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anesthesia, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Effect of jaw thrust and cricoid pressure maneuvers on glottic visualization during GlideScope videolaryngoscopy
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00540-012-1339-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M. Corda, Kevin T. Riutort, Alex J. Leone, Mueez K. Qureshi, Michael G. Heckman, Sorin J. Brull

Abstract

During performance of direct laryngoscopy in the difficult-to-visualize airway, several maneuvers have the potential to impact glottic visualization, including jaw thrust and cricoid pressure. The effect of these maneuvers on glottic visualization during videolaryngoscopy has not been studied. We evaluated the effect of jaw thrust and cricoid pressure maneuvers on both visualization of the glottis and the area of glottic opening visible during GlideScope-aided videolaryngoscopy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 71%
Unspecified 6 18%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,941,392
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#720
of 841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,467
of 158,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 841 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.