| Title |
What’s new in bacterial meningitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-015-4057-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthijs C. Brouwer, Eelco F. M. Wijdicks, Diederik van de Beek |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 26% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 70% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,186,603
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,153
of 4,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,714
of 298,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#35
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.