↓ Skip to main content

Molecular mechanisms of flavivirus membrane fusion

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
Title
Molecular mechanisms of flavivirus membrane fusion
Published in
Amino Acids, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00726-009-0370-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Stiasny, Richard Fritz, Karen Pangerl, Franz X. Heinz

Abstract

Flaviviruses comprise a number of important human pathogens including yellow fever, dengue, West Nile, Japanese encephalitis and tick-borne encephalitis viruses. They are small enveloped viruses that enter cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis and release their nucleocapsid into the cytoplasm by fusing their membrane with the endosomal membrane. The fusion event is triggered by the acidic pH in the endosome and is mediated by the major envelope protein E. Based on the atomic structures of the pre- and post-fusion conformations of E, a fusion model has been proposed that includes several steps leading from the metastable assembly of E at the virion surface to membrane merger and fusion pore formation trough conversion of E into a stable trimeric post-fusion conformation. Using recombinant subviral particles of tick-borne encephalitis virus as a model, we have defined individual steps of the molecular processes underlying the flavivirus fusion mechanisms. This includes the identification of a conserved histidine as being part of the pH sensor in the fusion protein that responds to the acidic pH and thus initiates the structural transitions driving fusion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 189 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 22%
Researcher 36 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 29 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Chemistry 5 3%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 37 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2012.
All research outputs
#6,378,772
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#412
of 1,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,409
of 94,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.