↓ Skip to main content

Is hope good for motivating collective action in the context of climate change? Differentiating hope’s emotion- and problem-focused coping functions

Overview of attention for article published in Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is hope good for motivating collective action in the context of climate change? Differentiating hope’s emotion- and problem-focused coping functions
Published in
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, September 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.003
Authors

Martijn van Zomeren, Inga L. Pauls, Smadar Cohen-Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Researcher 13 8%
Lecturer 11 7%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 59 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 57 34%
Environmental Science 13 8%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 63 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2022.
All research outputs
#565,018
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#214
of 2,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,747
of 352,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.