| Title |
Differences in individual empowerment outcomes of socially disadvantaged women: effects of mode of participation and structural changes in a physical activity promotion program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00038-010-0214-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ulrike Röger, Alfred Rütten, Annika Frahsa, Karim Abu-Omar, Antony Morgan |
| Abstract |
This study explored the differences in individual empowerment outcomes of a group of socially disadvantaged women participating in physical activity promotion. The outcomes observed were assessed in the context of the women's mode of participation and the structural organizational and community level changes, which took place during the implementation of the program. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 18 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 15% |
| Psychology | 11 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,740,207
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#1,211
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,226
of 109,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.